Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Chile
30.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
31.3%
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 31.3% against 30.3% in Chile, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.5% | 34.9% | 19.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 40.7% | 17.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 31.3% | 6.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 31.3% against 30.3% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population