Mexico vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mexico
28.4%
in 2020
South Africa
29.3%
in 2021
Mexico rank
20th
South Africa rank
18th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mexico
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 29.3% against 28.4% in Mexico, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 18th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 37.6% | 32.0% | 5.6% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 28.8% | 0.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mexico or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 29.3% against 28.4% in Mexico as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mexico and South Africa?
- 0.9%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mexico ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 18th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population