Indonesia vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Indonesia
29.3%
in 2022
South Africa
29.3%
in 2021
Indonesia rank
19th
South Africa rank
18th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Indonesia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 29.3% against 29.3% in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 18th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.2% | 30.8% | 3.4% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 26.2% | 29.1% | 2.8% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Indonesia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 29.3% against 29.3% in Indonesia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Indonesia and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Indonesia and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Indonesia ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 18th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population