Georgia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
52.9%
in 2021
Serbia
51.7%
in 2022
Georgia rank
5th
Serbia rank
6th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 52.9% against 51.7% in Serbia, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 61.0% | 46.2% | 14.7% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 44.2% | 8.8% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 52.9% against 51.7% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Serbia?
- 1.2%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population