Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
40.2%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
46.4%
in 2020
Belarus rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 46.4% against 40.2% in Belarus, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 46.4% against 40.2% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population