Armenia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
48.5%
in 2022
Serbia
51.7%
in 2022
Armenia rank
8th
Serbia rank
6th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 51.7% against 48.5% in Armenia, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.8% | 45.9% | 3.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 49.5% | 47.9% | 1.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 51.7% against 48.5% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Serbia?
- 3.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population