Argentina vs Armenia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
49.6%
in 2022
Armenia
48.5%
in 2022
Argentina rank
7th
Armenia rank
8th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Armenia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 49.6% against 48.5% in Armenia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 7th and Armenia ranks 8th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Armenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.7% | 50.5% | 3.3% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 47.2% | 52.0% | 4.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Armenia?
- Argentina, at 49.6% against 48.5% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Armenia?
- 1.1%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Armenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Armenia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 7th and Armenia ranks 8th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population