Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Peru
8.0%
in 2022
Poland
7.8%
in 2019
Peru rank
24th
Poland rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Peru currently reports 8.0% against 7.8% in Poland, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 24th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 15.4% | 13.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 11.8% | 9.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Peru or Poland?
- Peru, at 8.0% against 7.8% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Peru and Poland?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Peru ranks 24th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population