El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
El Salvador
15.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
15.5%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
16th
Mongolia rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 15.5% against 15.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.3% | 13.4% | 2.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 13.3% | 8.5% | 4.8% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 15.5% against 15.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population