El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
El Salvador
14.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
15.8%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
21st
Mongolia rank
19th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 15.8% against 14.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 19th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.3% | 14.0% | 1.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 13.5% | 8.8% | 4.8% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 15.8% against 14.3% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- El Salvador ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 19th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population