Belarus vs Honduras: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Belarus
20.4%
in 2019
Honduras
19.5%
in 2019
Belarus rank
18th
Honduras rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Belarus
- Honduras
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 20.4% against 19.5% in Honduras, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 18th and Honduras ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.0% | 18.5% | 1.5% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 20.1% | 18.6% | 1.5% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Belarus or Honduras?
- Belarus, at 20.4% against 19.5% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Belarus and Honduras?
- 0.9%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Honduras?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Honduras rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Belarus ranks 18th and Honduras ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population