Belarus vs El Salvador: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Belarus
20.4%
in 2019
El Salvador
22.5%
in 2022
Belarus rank
18th
El Salvador rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 22.5% against 20.4% in Belarus, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Belarus ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 17th of 31 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.0% | 22.4% | 2.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 20.2% | 21.5% | 1.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Belarus or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 22.5% against 20.4% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 2.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Belarus ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population