Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Mongolia
21.0%
in 2020
Peru
21.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
23rd
Peru rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21.9% against 21.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.2% | 19.2% | 1.9% | Peru |
| 2010s | 20.3% | 19.6% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 21.0% | 16.8% | 4.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 21.9% against 21.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population