Armenia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Armenia
21.3%
in 2022
Peru
21.9%
in 2022
Armenia rank
22nd
Peru rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Armenia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21.9% against 21.3% in Armenia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.7% | 18.2% | 3.5% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 20.0% | 2.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 19.3% | 2.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Armenia or Peru?
- Peru, at 21.9% against 21.3% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Armenia and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Armenia ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population