El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
El Salvador
19.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
15.7%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
20th
Mongolia rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 19.3% against 15.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 21st of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 22.6% | 3.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19.8% | 19.5% | 0.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 19.3% against 15.7% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 3.6%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- El Salvador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 21st of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population