Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Ecuador
22.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
21.4%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 22.1% against 21.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.6% | 17.7% | 2.9% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22.2% | 21.4% | 0.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 22.1% against 21.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population