Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Dominican Republic
22.2%
in 2021
Kazakhstan
22.0%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
12th
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 22.2% against 22.0% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.8% | 19.7% | 4.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 22.2% | 22.0% | 0.1% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Dominican Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Dominican Republic, at 22.2% against 22.0% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 0.2%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population