Belarus vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Belarus
20.6%
in 2019
Mongolia
15.7%
in 2020
Belarus rank
18th
Mongolia rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 20.6% against 15.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Belarus ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 21st of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 23.1% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19.9% | 19.0% | 0.9% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 20.6% against 15.7% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 4.9%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Belarus ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 21st of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population