Belarus vs El Salvador: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Belarus
20.6%
in 2019
El Salvador
19.3%
in 2022
Belarus rank
18th
El Salvador rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 20.6% against 19.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 20th of 30 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 20.5% | 1.5% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 20.4% | 20.2% | 0.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Belarus or El Salvador?
- Belarus, at 20.6% against 19.3% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 1.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Belarus ranks 18th and El Salvador ranks 20th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population