Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Mongolia
19.4%
in 2020
Peru
17.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
19th
Peru rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.4% against 17.9% in Peru, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 19th and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.7% | 14.6% | 6.1% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 20.2% | 14.5% | 5.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 19.4% | 12.1% | 7.3% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 19.4% against 17.9% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population