Belarus vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic
Belarus
17.3%
in 2019
Peru
17.9%
in 2022
Belarus rank
22nd
Peru rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic over time
- Belarus
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 17.9% against 17.3% in Belarus, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.5% | 13.9% | 2.6% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 17.0% | 14.4% | 2.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic, Belarus or Peru?
- Peru, at 17.9% against 17.3% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic between Belarus and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic?
- Belarus ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population