Kyrgyzstan vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kyrgyzstan
20.1%
in 2020
Peru
20.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
33rd
Peru rank
31st
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 20.2% against 20.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.3% | 21.2% | 0.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 20.1% | 20.1% | 0.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kyrgyzstan or Peru?
- Peru, at 20.2% against 20.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population