Indonesia vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Indonesia
21.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
21.5%
in 2020
Indonesia rank
21st
Mongolia rank
23rd
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Indonesia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 21.8% against 21.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.1% | 21.2% | 3.9% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 23.5% | 20.7% | 2.8% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 23.1% | 21.5% | 1.6% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Indonesia or Mongolia?
- Indonesia, at 21.8% against 21.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 0.3%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Indonesia ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population