Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Mongolia
21.5%
in 2020
Peru
23.0%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
35th
Peru rank
32nd
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 23.0% against 21.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 35th and Peru ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.2% | 26.7% | 5.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 20.8% | 25.8% | 5.0% | Peru |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 21.7% | 0.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 23.0% against 21.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Mongolia ranks 35th and Peru ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population