Ecuador vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Ecuador
25.6%
in 2022
South Africa
26.1%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
12th
South Africa rank
9th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 26.1% against 25.6% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 9th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.7% | 26.3% | 2.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 26.2% | 25.9% | 0.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 26.1% against 25.6% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.5%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Ecuador ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 9th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population