Peru vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Peru
4.1%
in 2022
South Africa
1.8%
in 2021
Peru rank
31st
South Africa rank
34th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.1% against 1.8% in South Africa, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Peru's figure about 2.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8% | 8.4% | 6.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 1.2% | 2.2% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 4.1% against 1.8% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.3%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 34th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population