Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Chile
19.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
20.2%
in 2020
Chile rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 20.2% against 19.2% in Chile, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.3% | 21.5% | 6.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 17.0% | 21.5% | 4.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 18.2% | 20.2% | 2.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 20.2% against 19.2% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population