Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Mongolia
18.8%
in 2020
Poland
18.8%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
13th
Poland rank
12th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 18.8% against 18.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 12th of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.2% | 17.5% | 2.8% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 22.7% | 17.7% | 5.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 18.8% against 18.8% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 12th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population