Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.3%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
30.0%
in 2020
Belarus rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 30.0% against 29.3% in Belarus, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 30.0% against 29.3% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population