Peru vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Peru
23.9%
in 2022
South Africa
24.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
27th
South Africa rank
26th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 24.7% against 23.9% in Peru, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 26th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.4% | 25.3% | 5.1% | Peru |
| 2020s | 22.1% | 24.6% | 2.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 24.7% against 23.9% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 26th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population