Peru vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Peru
20.3%
in 2022
South Africa
21.4%
in 2021
Peru rank
32nd
South Africa rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 21.4% against 20.3% in Peru, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.3% | 21.8% | 0.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 20.1% | 21.4% | 1.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 21.4% against 20.3% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Peru and South Africa?
- 1.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Peru ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population