Indonesia vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Indonesia
23.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
23.0%
in 2020
Indonesia rank
21st
Mongolia rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Indonesia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 23.6% against 23.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 24th of 37 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.3% | 22.5% | 2.7% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 24.7% | 21.4% | 3.3% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 28.3% | 23.0% | 5.4% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Indonesia or Mongolia?
- Indonesia, at 23.6% against 23.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 0.6%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Indonesia ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 24th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population