Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person

Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
40.89
in 2027
Zimbabwe
44.42
in 2027
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person over time

  • Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
  • Zimbabwe
01020304050200520162027

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 44.42 against 40.89 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 3.53.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ahead.

Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 44.45 37.06 7.4 Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
2010s 42.23 36.7 5.52 Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income
2020s 40.86 42.66 1.8 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average weekly hours actually worked per employed person, Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 44.42 against 40.89 in Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in average weekly hours actually worked per employed person between Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
3.53, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for average weekly hours actually worked per employed person?
Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/average-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-ilo-modelled-estimates/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/average-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-ilo-modelled-estimates/central-and-western-asia-upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/">Central and Western Asia: Upper-middle income vs Zimbabwe: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in their main job. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.