Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guinea-Bissau: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO)

Asia and the Pacific: Low income
39.73
in 2027
Guinea-Bissau
42.92
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Low income rank
44th
Guinea-Bissau rank
43rd

Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO) over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Low income
  • Guinea-Bissau
010203040200520162027

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 42.92 against 39.73 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income, a difference of 3.19.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Asia and the Pacific: Low income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 44th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 43rd of 87 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Low income Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 40.37 41.32 0.948 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 40.21 42.01 1.8 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 39.81 42.71 2.9 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average weekly hours actually worked per employed person, Asia and the Pacific: Low income or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 42.92 against 39.73 in Asia and the Pacific: Low income as of 2027.
What is the difference in average weekly hours actually worked per employed person between Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guinea-Bissau?
3.19, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guinea-Bissau?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Low income and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for average weekly hours actually worked per employed person?
Asia and the Pacific: Low income ranks 44th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 43rd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guinea-Bissau: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/average-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/average-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employed-person-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-low-income/guinea-bissau/">Asia and the Pacific: Low income vs Guinea-Bissau: Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in their main job. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.