Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -All Social
Ecuador
2.95
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
3.04
in 2020
Ecuador rank
19th
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.04 against 2.95 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.55 | 2.73 | 1.18 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1.48 | 3.04 | 1.57 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -all social, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.04 against 2.95 in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -all social between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.09, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -all social?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Social Protection and Labor programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)