Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - All Social
Kyrgyzstan
2.3
in 2020
South Africa
2.35
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
22nd
South Africa rank
21st
Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2.35 against 2.3 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.3 | 2.37 | 0.0708 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 2.3 | 2.05 | 0.2535 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - all social, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2.35 against 2.3 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - all social between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 0.05, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Social Insurance programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)