El Salvador vs Panama: Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Domestic Private
El Salvador
1.57 preT
in 2022
Panama
1.69 preT
in 2023
El Salvador rank
18th
Panama rank
15th
Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Domestic Private over time
- El Salvador
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1.69 preT against 1.57 preT in El Salvador, a difference of 0.12 preT.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 18th and Panama ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.14 preT | 1.03 preT | 0.1027 preT | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 1.24 preT | 1.65 preT | 0.4067 preT | Panama |
| 2020s | 1.61 preT | 1.63 preT | 0.0156 preT | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - domestic private, El Salvador or Panama?
- Panama, at 1.69 preT against 1.57 preT in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - domestic private between El Salvador and Panama?
- 0.12 preT, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Panama?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Panama rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - domestic private?
- El Salvador ranks 18th and Panama ranks 15th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Domestic Private Transfers programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)