Kyrgyzstan vs Vietnam: Average per capita transfer held by 1st … preT Protection Labor 1st
Kyrgyzstan
2.94 preT
in 2020
Vietnam
3.3 preT
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Vietnam rank
15th
Average per capita transfer held by 1st … preT Protection Labor 1st over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 3.3 preT against 2.94 preT in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.36 preT.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Vietnam ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.05 preT | 0.643 preT | 0.4113 preT | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 2.72 preT | 1.01 preT | 1.71 preT | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 2.94 preT | 3.3 preT | 0.3583 preT | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all, Kyrgyzstan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 3.3 preT against 2.94 preT in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all between Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 0.36 preT, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Vietnam ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Social Protection and Labor programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)