Ecuador vs South Africa: Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -All
Ecuador
0.7533
in 2022
South Africa
0.6836
in 2021
Ecuador rank
23rd
South Africa rank
26th
Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -All over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.7533 against 0.6836 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0697.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 26th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5018 | 1.16 | 0.6563 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.749 | 0.6836 | 0.0654 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 0.7533 against 0.6836 in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.0697, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -all?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 26th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 1st quintile (poorest) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Social Protection and Labor programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)