Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Average per capita transfer - All Social Insurance -rural
Ecuador
4.25
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
2.57
in 2020
Ecuador rank
24th
Kyrgyzstan rank
26th
Average per capita transfer - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 4.25 against 2.57 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.68.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.14 | 2.66 | 1.48 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 2.51 | 2.57 | 0.0613 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer - all social insurance -rural, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 4.25 against 2.57 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer - all social insurance -rural between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.68, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for average per capita transfer - all social insurance -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 24th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Social Insurance programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)