Mauritius vs Uzbekistan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Mauritius
0.5%
in 2020
Uzbekistan
0.5%
in 2020
Mauritius rank
116th
Uzbekistan rank
115th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Mauritius
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.4% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Mauritius or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Mauritius and Uzbekistan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Mauritius ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.