Iceland vs Mozambique: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Iceland
0.0%
in 2020
Mozambique
0.1%
in 2020
Iceland rank
169th
Mozambique rank
167th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Iceland
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mozambique ahead.
Iceland ranks 169th and Mozambique ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Iceland or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Iceland and Mozambique?
- 0.1%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mozambique?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Mozambique rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Iceland ranks 169th and Mozambique ranks 167th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.