Finland vs Tajikistan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Finland
0.8%
in 2020
Tajikistan
0.7%
in 2020
Finland rank
91st
Tajikistan rank
94th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Finland
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.8% against 0.7% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 91st and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 171 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.8% | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Finland or Tajikistan?
- Finland, at 0.8% against 0.7% in Tajikistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Finland and Tajikistan?
- 0.1%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tajikistan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Tajikistan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Finland ranks 91st and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.