Finland vs Kyrgyzstan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Finland
0.8%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
0.8%
in 2020
Finland rank
91st
Kyrgyzstan rank
89th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Finland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 91st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Finland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Finland ranks 91st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.