Czechia vs Uzbekistan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Czechia
0.5%
in 2020
Uzbekistan
0.5%
in 2020
Czechia rank
118th
Uzbekistan rank
115th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Czechia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Czechia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.8% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Czechia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Czechia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Czechia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uzbekistan?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
- How do Czechia and Uzbekistan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Czechia ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.