Cape Verde vs Uzbekistan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Cape Verde
0.5%
in 2020
Uzbekistan
0.5%
in 2020
Cape Verde rank
117th
Uzbekistan rank
115th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Cape Verde
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 117th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Cape Verde or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Cape Verde as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Cape Verde and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Uzbekistan?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and Uzbekistan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Cape Verde ranks 117th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.