Argentina vs Uzbekistan: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Argentina
0.5%
in 2020
Uzbekistan
0.5%
in 2020
Argentina rank
114th
Uzbekistan rank
115th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Argentina
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Argentina ranks 114th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Argentina or Uzbekistan?
- Argentina, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Uzbekistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Uzbekistan rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Argentina ranks 114th and Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.