Albania vs Slovenia: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Albania
0.6%
in 2020
Slovenia
0.7%
in 2020
Albania rank
101st
Slovenia rank
99th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Albania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.7% against 0.6% in Albania, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 99th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 1.5% | 3.3% | Albania |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 1.2% | 0.8% | Albania |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.3% | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Albania or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.7% against 0.6% in Albania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Albania and Slovenia?
- 0.1%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Slovenia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Albania and Slovenia rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Albania ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 99th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.