Albania vs Burundi: Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force
Albania
0.6%
in 2020
Burundi
0.6%
in 2020
Albania rank
101st
Burundi rank
104th
Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force over time
- Albania
- Burundi
How they compare
Albania currently reports 0.6% against 0.6% in Burundi, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 101st and Burundi ranks 104th of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and Burundi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 0.9% | 3.9% | Albania |
| 2000s | 2.1% | 1.8% | 0.3% | Albania |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.2% | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force, Albania or Burundi?
- Albania, at 0.6% against 0.6% in Burundi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force between Albania and Burundi?
- 0.0%, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Burundi?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Albania and Burundi rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force?
- Albania ranks 101st and Burundi ranks 104th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of the total labor force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.