Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run
Tunisia
2,288
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,311
in 2023
Tunisia rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
17th
Annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run over time
- Tunisia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,311 against 2,288 in Tunisia, a difference of 23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tunisia ahead.
Tunisia ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 130 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,353 | 1,904 | 448.43 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2,345 | 1,890 | 454.76 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 2,269 | 2,096 | 173.04 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,311 against 2,288 in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 23, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run?
- Tunisia ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Annual working hours per worker vs gdp per capita long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.